For those who don’t see my radio blog
By richie...Filed under: 昨天把radioblog搞了一搞，放在sidebar里。
我用的是freewebtown.com的免费空间，但国内把它给ban了。
于是我的radioblog在某程度上中看不中用：
June 20, 2005
6 Comments »
The URI to TrackBack this entry is: http://secretdessert.blogsome.com/2005/06/20/for-those-who-dont-see-my-radio-blog/trackback/
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>
so hard to find free hostings with enough space nowadays…
is urs support files which are greater than 1Mb? coz those files don’t work on my radio.blog, that’s why i hav to trim them into half…
Comment by alien — June 20, 2005 @ 2:06 am
i strongly recommend my one!! no such restriction of 1mb upload and all that stuff..
the only big fat shame is CHINA’s big fat block on it..
Comment by 珍宝猪 — June 20, 2005 @ 2:33 am
that’s ready a great problem lar!!! I’ve been complained abt similar stuff all along…actually i started a new blog in blogsome today (tony’s suggestion…) but i never like it at all. =.=
Comment by alien — June 20, 2005 @ 8:33 am
blogsome makes great use of WORDPRESS, a blog-software platform which seems to be more multi-functional and in some way considered to be more humanistic.. however, there still lacks of some kinda really basic function (say for example,editing mode is too much depended on codes rather than iconic buttons)..all that jazz,blahblahblah
And yea,i’m complaining though have been using it frequently..
Comment by 珍宝猪 — June 20, 2005 @ 9:52 am
搞不懂不是iconic buttons会差别很大吗？它还不是一样是按钮？又不用你去写code，只不过不是iconic buttons比较不生动而已，使用完全一样啊没有任何不便啊，就算是iconic buttons按下去也是code出来啊！wordpress是现在最多人用的了。主要是makemyblog要挂了，不让aj可以去那边啊，10M空间任你用。http://blog.roodo.com/其实也不错，但是国内也封了…
Comment by Tony — June 20, 2005 @ 10:13 am
ur so-called iconic buttons of wordpress are “quick tags” only, i dun think thats convenient enough for a CODE IDIOT user like me. Is it just not lively? no. i think it’s too lively on codes, which leads to a time waste on editing words. WHATEVER.
Comment by 珍宝猪 — June 22, 2005 @ 2:56 am